Mozilla founder slams for cryptocurrency

mozilla founder slams for cryptocurrency

Bitcoin and Ethereum use a mechanism called proof-of-work to power their networks and mint new blocks of each currency. This calculation, by design, has become more complex over the years as the networks grew and gave birth to an industry of firms that run thousands of GPUs around the clock to participate in solving the puzzle.

Bitcoin mining consumes about 148 terawatt-hours of energy annually, the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance estimates. Many cryptocurrency proponents have, however, either disputed such findings or have made a case for why it is worth it.

In recent months, a broader divide has started to emerge in the industry. The critics have challenged some of the fundamental value proposition of web3.


Tantek Çelik slammed cryptocurrencies as being unsustainable, stating:

Proof-of-work methods (eg, blockchains) are harmful for sustainability… the more such methods are adopted, the more their energy requirements grow, without any discernible upper bound, which is grossly irresponsible given the global environmental crisis.

The Bitcoin-loving laser-eye brigade were predictably unhappy with Çelik’s observations.

Zawinski, aka JWZ, who named the CADT model of software development and has a Dunning-Krugerrands tag on his blog for crypto-cash-related posts, is a reliable source of insight and pithy quotes, such as: “Some people, when confronted with a problem, think ‘I know, I’ll use regular expressions.’ Now they have two problems.”

Another gem? “[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable.

Mozilla founder slams for cryptocurrency

Waterfox: A Firefox fork that could teach Mozilla a lesson

  • Sweden asks EU to ban Bitcoin mining because while hydroelectric power is cheap, they need it for other stuff
  • Another Debian dust-up with Firefox dependencies – but there is an annoying and awkward workaround
  • Is your Apple Mac running macOS Monterey leaking memory? It may be due to mouse cursor customization
  • Thousands of Firefox users accidentally commit login cookies on GitHub
  • Mozilla has accepted crypto-coin donations for years, perhaps as part of its long-ongoing efforts to alienate its own users: it’s only the payment provider that changed lately, it seems.

    When we approached Zawinski for comment, he said he was “actually far more depressed at the fact that the Long Now Foundation and Internet Archive have bought into this scam [cryptocurrencies – ed.] than that Mozilla has.


    He made a clear argument pointing out the environmental effect of the conventional banking system and paper dollar. On the other hand, crypto supporters and enthusiasts in retaliation against Mozilla’s anti-crypto move have vowed to stop using the Firefox browser.

    Although, this won’t be the first time a major firm stops receiving cryptocurrencies citing its environmental impact.
    Earlier in 2021, Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla Motors announced the company will stop accepting Bitcoin as a payment option. He based the reason for the abrupt decision on environmental concerns citing the negative impact bitcoin mining has on the environment.

    Elon’s claims at that time sure did come under criticism.
    But since then, crypto miners are now more focused on environmentally friendly approaches to mine bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies.

    wait till them guys hear about the environmental cost of paper dollars and the entire banking infrastructure, i am sure they will have the same level of meltdown about their own constant environmental impact https://t.co/jInIaIA0DS

    — Shibetoshi Nakamoto (@BillyM2k) January 7, 2022

    He went on to describe outrage culture as “cringe” in a follow-up tweet.

    As reported by U.Today, Mozilla told its Twitter followers that it had started accepting donations in Dogecoin, Bitcoin, Ethereum and a slew of other cryptocurrencies in partnership with BitPay, the number one crypto payment processor.

    The tweet was met with scathing criticism, with detractors accusing the California-based non-profit of destroying its reputation and threatening to cancel recurring donations.

    Mozilla.org co-founder Jamie Zawinski joined the backlash on Monday.

    Are there any special tax rules for contributions of cryptocurrency?

    Because the IRS has indicated that it will treat cryptocurrency as property for U.S. tax purposes (see IRS Notice 2014-21), donations of cryptocurrency may be subject to special rules as to the amount of your charitable deduction, the documentation that must be provided to claim a tax deduction (which may include specific tax forms or qualified appraisals), or other matters. (See http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc506.html for an overview.) Depending on your individual circumstances, a gift of cryptocurrency could have better or worse tax consequences than a cash gift.

    Mozilla Foundation is happy to sign a donor’s Form 8283 upon request, but it is the donor’s sole responsibility to determine whether this is necessary and, if so, to provide the form for signature at least 10 business days in advance. PDF copies of the form may be sent to [email protected] for signature.

    Any other documentation (e.g., an appraisal) remains the donor’s sole responsibility.What personal information does Mozilla require cryptocurrency donors to provide?

    In most cases, Mozilla requires only an email address, which is necessary so that Mozilla can send them an acknowledgment letter for tax purposes.

    wait till them guys hear about the environmental cost of paper dollars and the entire banking infrastructure, i am sure they will have the same level of meltdown about their own constant environmental impact https://t.co/jInIaIA0DS

    — Shibetoshi Nakamoto (@BillyM2k) January 7, 2022

    He went on to describe outrage culture as “cringe” in a follow-up tweet.

    As reported by U.Today, Mozilla told its Twitter followers that it had started accepting donations in Dogecoin, Bitcoin, Ethereum and a slew of other cryptocurrencies in partnership with BitPay, the number one crypto payment processor.

    The tweet was met with scathing criticism, with detractors accusing the California-based non-profit of destroying its reputation and threatening to cancel recurring donations.

    Mozilla.org co-founder Jamie Zawinski joined the backlash on Monday.

    — Mozilla (@mozilla) January 6, 2022

    However, Mozilla isn’t completely distancing itself from decentralized technologies like cryptocurrency, saying that “decentralized web technology continues to be an important area for us to explore.”

    “I’m glad Mozilla reversed course here,” Linss said in a Twitter DM to The Verge after we first published this article. “They play a crucial role in keeping the web open and free. I’m also grateful for the support of all the fans of Mozilla helping to keep them accountable to the ideals they were founded under.”

    Zawinski responded to Mozilla’s decision in a blog posted Thursday evening, where he kept up his sharp criticism.

    Ponzi grifters,” he said, adding an expletive.

    Peter Linss, the founder of Gecko, the engine that powered the browser, joined the conversation in telling Mozilla that it was “meant to be better than this.”

    This isn’t the first time a major firm has faced backlash — or distanced itself from Bitcoin — because of environmental concerns. In May last year, Tesla suspended accepting bitcoin as payment for its vehicles, just months after introducing the option.

    Musk said the firm was “concerned about rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for Bitcoin mining and transactions, especially coal.” Weeks later, he said the company will “most likely” accept bitcoin again once the mining rate for the cryptocurrency reaches 50% renewables.

    Questions around the environmental footprint of Bitcoin have been linked to how various tokens are created.

    Mozilla stated that the Mozilla foundation will be receiving crypto donations through the BitPay platform or theThe Official website.

    The announcement was met with a storm of criticism and fuss with several cynics alleging the non-profit organization was damaging its prestige. A few of these individuals further threatened to halt future donations.
    The massive disapproval also included that of Jamie Zawinski, Mozilla co-founder, who no longer takes part in the project since 2000.

    Zawinski was ardent in his criticism after making a tweet against crypto. He further went on to his website, publicizing a blog post stating that the business model of the crypto industry is unrealistic.
    He asserted that the crypto industry only produces pollution and nothing else and investors go ahead to turn that into money.

    The uproar on Twitter was prompted when Mozilla started receiving crypto donations in Dogecoin.

    Billy Markus tweeted his displeasure concerning Mozilla’s move, indicating the environmental impact of the conventional banking system and fiat currency. In his tweet, he asserted that the general public should be made aware of the environmental cost of the traditional banking infrastructure and paper dollar.

    He continued to say that he’s certain both will have a similar level of impact on the environment.

    The anti-crypto uproar began on the 31st of December 2021 when Mozilla prompted its users to make donations to the foundation either in Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and Ether.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.