Richard stallman cryptocurrency blockchain gnu

richard stallman cryptocurrency blockchain gnu

The post tallying votes suggests options five and six never achieved a majority.

While the Debian project will remain silent, option seven includes the provision for “Any individual (including Debian members) wishing to (co-)sign any of the open letters on this subject is invited to do this in a personal capacity.”

And plenty have: The Register counted 117 signatories with Debian affiliations among the 3010 who put their names to the open letter calling for Stallman’s removal (which stopped listing signatories on April 1st). A letter in support of Stallman lists six Debian-affiliated names among 6,415 signatories.

Now he quits top roles amid rape remarks outcry”.

  • ^“A radical proposal to keep your personal data safe”. 3 April 2018.
  • ^Carlet, Claude; Hasan, M. Anwar; Saraswat, Vishal (2016-12-09). Security, Privacy, and Applied Cryptography Engineering: 6th International Conference, SPACE 2016, Hyderabad, India, December 14-18, 2016, Proceedings.

    Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-49445-6.

  • ^Dold, Florian (2019-02-25). The GNU Taler system : practical and provably secure electronic payments (phdthesis thesis).

    Université Rennes 1.

  • ^Pentland, Alex ‘Sandy’. “Digital cash and privacy: What are the alternatives to Libra?”. MIT Media Lab. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  • ^“Kampf der Kryptowährungen – das sind die Alternativen zu Libra”. (in German).
  • It has vocal support from GNU Project founder Richard Stallman.[11] Stallman has described the program as “designed to be anonymous for the payer, but payees are always identified.”[12] In a paper published in Security, Privacy, and Applied Cryptography Engineering, GNU Taler is described as meeting ethical considerations – the paying customer is anonymous while the merchant is identified and taxable.[13][14] An implementation is provided by Taler Systems SA.[15][16]

    See also[edit]

    • DigiCash
    • Microtransaction
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Free software
    • Open source
    • Populism


    1. ^“2021-9: GNU Taler v0.8 released”. 24 August 2021. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
    2. ^“GNU Taler v0.8 released”.

    He also recommended wording of a license for applications that authors are willing to let users modify.

    “We will be able to reject and even replace the non-free, non-trivial Javascript programs, just as we reject and replace non-free packages that are offered for installation in the usual way,” Stallman said.

    On a related note, Stallman has challenged Adobe Systems’ Flash and Microsoft’s Silverlight, and suggested that the open-source Moonlight implementation of Silverlight goes against his notion of free. Stallman called Flash an “extended variant” of Javascript, although further study is needed.

    Stallman criticized Silverlight for distributing non-free codecs and – by implication – the Novell-backed Moonlight, which is also licensed to use those codecs.

    The Debian GNU/Linux Project decided to offer its voting members eight options to consider, as follows:

    • Call for the FSF board removal, as in
    • Call for Stallman’s resignation from all FSF bodies
    • Discourage collaboration with the FSF while Stallman is in a leading position
    • Call on the FSF to further its governance processes
    • Support Stallman’s reinstatement, as in
    • Denounce the witch-hunt against RMS and the FSF
    • Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue
    • Further Discussion

    Voting on those options ran for a fortnight and concluded on Saturday.

    The winner was option seven: “Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue”.

    Debian votes use the Condorcet Method, a complex preferential voting scheme, to reach a decision.

    Richard Stallman reelection to the board at the Free Software Foundation.

    The decision to say nothing came after a call for the project to support an open letter that called for Stallman’s removal from all leadership positions in the free software community and the removal of the entire Free Software Foundation for enabling Stallman.

    Stallman resigned from the foundation in 2019 after making incredibly insensitive remarks, in which he questioned whether the term “assault” was applicable in the case of a young woman who claimed she was coerced by Jeffrey Epstein to have sex with Stallman’s friend and AI pioneer Marvin Minksy.

    But in March 2021 Stallman returned to the foundation’s board and vowed not to resign again.

    Numerous protests ensued, most calling for Stallman’s removal.

    Freedom for software users is no less important today than it was five years ago.

    The definition of free software is that it respects users’ freedom. It’s free as in freedom — price is not the issue. Specifically, it means that you as user are free to run the program as you wish, study the source code and change it so that the program does what you wish.

    and to redistribute copies with or without changes.

    With these freedoms, the users control the software and control their computing.

    Without these freedoms, the software controls the users. Don’t let that happen to you!

    I launched the development of the GNU operating system in 1984 specifically to make it possible to use a computer without letting the software control you.

    In 1992, the kernel Linux was freed and filled the last gap in GNU.

    If the programs were free software, users would be able to find and remove the spying and other malicious features.

    Android’s source code is free software, but in many phones the binaries of Android are not free, because the phones are set up to refuse to run modified versions if the user installs them. This practice is called “tivoization”, named after the product that pioneered it).

    If the software in Android were under version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL), users would be guaranteed the freedom to install their own modified versions.

    Even when Android is not tivoized, it needs nonfree drivers or firmware to run. As far as I know, no smartphone is made that can be run without proprietary software.
    None respects its users’ freedom.

    Gemini version available ♊︎

    Cryptocurrency Patents Are Bogus (Abstract) Patents and Red Hat Ought to Quit Pursuing Blockchain (Software) Patents

    Posted in America, Patents, Red Hat at 10:36 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

    The ‘patent-printing’ machine just carries on printing

    Summary: With cryptocurrencies and with blockchains receiving a lot of buzz we’re also seeing patents being granted on them, never mind if such patents are clearly abstract and thus not patent-eligible

    THE fact that when one says things like “blockchain” we’re supposed to be astounded and impressed (and grant a patent) is deeply problematic.

    The USPTO certainly knows that these are abstract patents, but it grants these anyway.

    CryptoSlate (one among many sites that are cryptocurrencies-centric) reveals yet another cryptocurrencies patent; those are actually being granted, not just pursued (with an application). Bogus software patents are still being granted by the Office and there’s no sufficient public scrutiny.

    There have been many articles like this one from Helen Partz about Bank of America’s “blockchain” patent applications and awards.
    Why don’t people point out that Section 101 would likely void these? Maybe they just don’t know about Section 101…

    Here’s the more disturbing thing: Red Hat has become part of this problem. Cloud Pro and a few other publications mentioned that last week.
    Red Hat does not combat software patents (not anymore); Instead, Red Hat has become part of the problem and it is nowadays patenting “blockchain” stuff.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.